Published October 29th 2002 by Routledge – 222 pages
Consensus Design offers a practical step by step guide to co-design; an increasingly important consideration for architects as they compete for work.
The text moves from identifying the methodology of the process to developing a series of principles and practical steps which illustrate how consensus design can be established.
For easy reference, flow charts show the process of achieving consensus design and include variations for different types of project and different groups of people. It gives clear timings so that agreements can be reached within a specific time frame, and also features a number of case studies to illustrate consensus design principles in practice. Case studies include projects in the UK, US, and Sweden.
Consensus design isn't just a utopian ideal. It's the only meaningful way in which people can be involved in shaping where they live and work. It can have an influence on social stability, crime-reduction, personal health and building longevity, all of which in turn have monetary and environmental cost implications. Its consideration can also greatly help architects win work and commissions.
Day argues that when places are designed by professionals for people, many things obvious to the residents are overlooked. When they are designed by lay people, the design can suffer from the lowest common denominator factor. When places are designed by both it tends to end up in conflict. However, Consensus Design shows that co-design is not doomed to either conflict or banality if it is managed correctly.
“The book reads as an instruction manual, complete with ideograms sketched by the author throughout the text.”
— Journal of Architectural Education, November 2004
Foreword by HRH The Prince of Wales
Part I. Introduction
Part II. Consensus Design: Why?
Part III. Consensus Design: How?
Part IV. Process Development: Two Projects
First - From experimental method to built project: Goethean Science Centre, Scotland. Second - Socially shaped process: Eco-village, Sweden.
Part V. Making it Work.
Part VI. Projects.
Reversing moods: Lunatic Asylum to Steiner School, Brighton.
Redeeming Buildings: East Bay Waldorf School, California.
Future Growth: East Bay Waldorf School, California.
Working with a developer: Mixed-use urban development, California.
Multiple viewpoints: Multi-faith centre, England. Desert ranch: Single-family house, Arizona.
Science Centre revisited, Goethean Science Centre, Scotland.
Part VII. Broader Implications
Part VIII. Useful Practicalities