Skip to Content

What Might Have Been

The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking

Edited by Neal J. Roese, James M. Olson

Psychology Press – 1995 – 424 pages

Purchasing Options:

  • Add to CartPaperback: $78.95
    978-0-8058-1614-3
    October 1st 1995
  • Add to CartHardback: $145.00
    978-0-8058-1613-6
    September 30th 1995

Description

Within a few short years, research on counterfactual thinking has mushroomed, establishing itself as one of the signature domains within social psychology. Counterfactuals are thoughts of what might have been, of possible past outcomes that could have taken place. Counterfactuals and their implications for perceptions of time and causality have long fascinated philosophers, but only recently have social psychologists made them the focus of empirical inquiry.

Following the publication of Kahneman and Tversky's seminal 1982 paper, a burgeoning literature has implicated counterfactual thinking in such diverse judgments as causation, blame, prediction, and suspicion; in such emotional experiences as regret, elation, disappointment and sympathy; and also in achievement, coping, and intergroup bias. But how do such thoughts come about? What are the mechanisms underlying their operation? How do their consequences benefit, or harm, the individual? When is their generation spontaneous and when is it strategic? This volume explores these and other numerous issues by assembling contributions from the most active researchers in this rapidly expanding subfield of social psychology. Each chapter provides an in-depth exploration of a particular conceptual facet of counterfactual thinking, reviewing previous work, describing ongoing, cutting-edge research, and offering novel theoretical analysis and synthesis. As the first edited volume to bring together the many threads of research and theory on counterfactual thinking, this book promises to be a source of insight and inspiration for years to come.

Contents

Contents: N.J. Roese, J.M. Olson, Counterfactual Thinking: A Critical Overview. E.P. Seelau, S.M. Seelau, G.L. Wells, P.D. Windschitl, Counterfactual Constraints. M. Kasimatis, G.L. Wells, Individual Differences in Couterfactual Thinking. D. Dunning, S.F. Madey, Comparison Processes in Counterfactual Thought. M.N. McMullen, K.D. Markman, I. Gavanski, Living in Neither the Best Nor the Worst of All Possible Worlds: Antecedents and Consequences of Upward and Downward Counterfactual Thinking. N.J. Roese, J.M. Olson, Functions of Counterfactual Thinking. S.J. Sherman, A.R. McConnell, Dysfunctional Implications of Counterfactual Thinking: When Alternatives to Reality Fail Us. J. Landman, Through a Glass Darkly: Worldviews, Counterfactual Thought, and Emotion. T. Gilovich, V.H. Medvec, Some Counterfactual Determinants of Satisfaction and Regret. F. Gleicher, D.S. Boninger, A. Strathman, D. Armor, J. Hetts, M. Ahn, With an Eye Toward the Future: The Impact of Counterfactual Thinking on Affect, Attitudes, and Behavior. D.T. Miller, B.R. Taylor, Counterfactual Thought, Regret, and Superstition: How to Avoid Kicking Yourself. A.L. McGill, J.G. Klein, Counterfactual and Contrastive Reasoning in Explanations for Performance: Implications for Gender Bias. C.G. Davis, D.R. Lehman, Counterfactual Thinking and Coping With Traumatic Life Events. D. Kahneman, Varieties of Counterfactual Thinking.

Name: What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking (Paperback)Psychology Press 
Description: Edited by Neal J. Roese, James M. Olson. Within a few short years, research on counterfactual thinking has mushroomed, establishing itself as one of the signature domains within social psychology. Counterfactuals are thoughts of what might have been, of possible past outcomes that could have...
Categories: Cognitive Science, Social Psychology