Criteria and Processes
Routledge – 2005 – 268 pages
Sustainability assessment is now emerging as a more transparent, comprehensive, integrated and far-sighted approach to decision making. Its basic demand is that all significant undertakings must make a positive contribution to sustainability. To apply this test, decision makers need criteria based on the core requirements of sustainability and the particularities of the context. As well, they need appropriately designed public processes; guidance on the weighing of alternatives, trade-offs and compromises; a supportive policy framework; suitable tools and inspiring examples.
Drawing from transdisciplinary theory and practical case experience, the book addresses these matters and many of the surrounding controversies. While sustainability assessment must always be adjusted to particular circumstances, the generic approach set out in this book is applicable virtually anywhere.
Beginnings: Stumbling Towards Sustainability Assessment. Assessment: Thirty-some Years of Environmental Assessment. Sustainability: The Essentials of the Concept. Practice: Sustainability in Illustrative Initiatives. Criteria: Sustainability Requirements as the Basis for Decision Making. Trade-offs: Facing Conflict and Compromise. Processes: Designing Sustainability Assessment Regimes. Decisions: Applying Sustainability-based Criteria in Significance Determinations and Other Common Assessment Judgements. Continuations: The Way Ahead . Index.
Robert B. Gibson is professor of environment and resource studies at the University of Waterloo in Ontario and Editorial Board Chair of Alternatives Journal. Selma Hassan is an urban planner and landscape architect with the City of Ottawa. Susan Holtz is an environment and energy policy consultant based in Toronto. James Tansey is a research associate at the Sustainable Development Research Initiative, University of British Columbia. Graham Whitelaw is a doctoral candidate in the School of Planning, University of Waterloo.